All-mountain · Rocker, camber, rocker
Extrem Project 83 Eco 2027
- Category
- All-mountain
- Profile
- Rocker, camber, rocker
- Lengths
- 162 · 169 · 176 · 183 cm
- Tip / waist / tail
- 121 / 83 / 111 mm
- Radius
- 15.0 mat 176 cm
Sidecut radius
Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co
Read: 15 Oct 2026
As the maker publishes it.
- Weight
- 1,670 g per ski at 176 cm
- Core
- Poplar/beech wood core
- Metal
- not stated
- Carbon
- not stated
- Sidewall
- not stated
- Base
- Isospeed 7515 race surface in extra high density polyethylene and high-quality graphite
- RRP
- No RRP published
- Intended ability
- not stated
Lengths and published dimensions
162 cm
162 cm
Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co
Read: 15 Oct 2026
All as the maker publishes them.
- Tip (mm)
- 119.0
- Waist (mm)
- 83.0
- Tail (mm)
- 109.0
- Radius (m)
- 13.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- 1,410
169 cm
169 cm
Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co
Read: 15 Oct 2026
All as the maker publishes them.
- Tip (mm)
- 120.0
- Waist (mm)
- 83.0
- Tail (mm)
- 110.0
- Radius (m)
- 14.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- 1,540
176 cm
176 cm
Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co
Read: 15 Oct 2026
All as the maker publishes them.
- Tip (mm)
- 121.0
- Waist (mm)
- 83.0
- Tail (mm)
- 111.0
- Radius (m)
- 15.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- 1,670
183 cm
183 cm
Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co
Read: 15 Oct 2026
All as the maker publishes them.
- Tip (mm)
- 122.0
- Waist (mm)
- 83.0
- Tail (mm)
- 112.0
- Radius (m)
- 16.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- 1,800
| Length | Tip (mm) | Waist (mm) | Tail (mm) | Radius (m) | Weight (g, per ski) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 cm 162 cm Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co Read: 15 Oct 2026 All as the maker publishes them. | 119.0 | 83.0 | 109.0 | 13.0 | 1,410 |
| 169 cm 169 cm Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co Read: 15 Oct 2026 All as the maker publishes them. | 120.0 | 83.0 | 110.0 | 14.0 | 1,540 |
| 176 cm 176 cm Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co Read: 15 Oct 2026 All as the maker publishes them. | 121.0 | 83.0 | 111.0 | 15.0 | 1,670 |
| 183 cm 183 cm Source: Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co Read: 15 Oct 2026 All as the maker publishes them. | 122.0 | 83.0 | 112.0 | 16.0 | 1,800 |
TAIL 111 mmWAIST 83 mmTIP 121 mm
“est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours. Where each number was read is under “Where these numbers come from” at the bottom.
What the model says
Carve radius, to scale
- Sidecut radius: 15 m
- Carve radius at 30° edge: 13 m
- Carve radius at 45° edge: 10.6 m
Edge hold and float
- Edge hold: 100%, Holds well
- Float: 30%, Sinks
The Extrem Project 83 Eco at 176 cm, worked out by the Edge Lab model for three skier weights.
70 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (69%)
- Float, powder
- Sinks (33%)
90 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (65%)
- Float, powder
- Sinks (30%)
110 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (63%)
- Float, powder
- Sinks (27%)
| Skier | Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60° edge | Edge hold, groomed | Edge hold, ice | Float, powder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 kg | 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (69%) | Sinks (33%) |
| 90 kg | 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (65%) | Sinks (30%) |
| 110 kg | 13 / 10.6 / 7.5 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (63%) | Sinks (27%) |
These are the model’s numbers, not measurements. Carve radius comes from the sidecut, so it does not change with weight; edge hold and float do. Flex and camber are our estimates (see “What the model uses” below).
By ability
The Extrem Project 83 Eco at 176 cm for a 90 kg skier on groomed snow. Reviewers are mostly experts, so read the left of each band for what most skiers get.
Edge hold
On firm snow, 176 cm- First-timer: slides (19%)
- Beginner: slides (41%)
- Intermediate: on the limit (70%), assumed level
- Advanced: holds well (95%)
- Expert: holds well (100%)
Float
In soft snow- First-timer: sinks (23%)
- Beginner: sinks (24%)
- Intermediate: sinks (26%), assumed level
- Advanced: sinks (28%)
- Expert: sinks (30%)
Ease
How forgiving it is- First-timer: hard (0%)
- Beginner: hard (46%)
- Intermediate: easy (93%), assumed level
- Advanced: easy (100%)
- Expert: easy (98%)
Our model, run with working assumptions about how each level skis (edge angle, speed, how much weight reaches the edge). Not measurements. The marked cell assumes an intermediate skier; compare with your own details to see your own level.
Who it suits
It suits
- 70 kg, intermediate, on groomers278 of 1055 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 12.1 m at 30° edge and 9.9 m at 45° (169 cm)
- Strongest here: edge hold. Weakest: float.
It doesn’t suit
- 90 kg, advanced, all over the mountain708 of 1055 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 13 m at 30° edge and 10.6 m at 45° (176 cm)
- Strongest here: edge hold. Weakest: float.
- 110 kg, expert, off-piste in soft snow722 of 1055 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 13.9 m at 30° edge and 11.3 m at 45° (183 cm)
What the model uses
| Flex underfoot | 204 N·m²est. Flex underfoot Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Camber height | 5.4 mmest. Camber height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker | 17.2 % of lengthest. Tip rocker Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker | 6.6 % of lengthest. Tail rocker Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker height | 9.2 mmest. Tip rocker height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker height | 1.9 mmest. Tail rocker height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Mount point offset | -7.6 cmest. Mount point offset Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
Made of
| Core | Poplar/beech wood core |
|---|---|
| Fibreglass | Other layup |
| Base | Isospeed 7515 race surface in extra high density polyethylene and high-quality graphite |
| Maker's description | A beech and poplar wood core provides a well-balanced mix of stability and agility, while a light rocker in the tip and tail makes the ski easy to handle in any situation. The Project 83 Eco is developed with sustainability in focus, built with as high a proportion of sustainable and bio-based materials as possible while still maintaining durability and longevity. |
Only what the maker prints. A field left out is one the maker does not state.
What reviewers say
No reviews indexed yet for this ski. We read Aka Skidor (opens in a new tab), Realskiers (opens in a new tab), STEEP (opens in a new tab), Ski Canada Magazine (opens in a new tab), SkiEssentials (opens in a new tab), SkiTalk (opens in a new tab) and Skipass (opens in a new tab); check their sites directly.
Compare with…
- Extrem Project 83 Eco vs Elan Ripstick 84 W (side by side for your setup)
- Extrem Project 83 Eco vs Elan Wildcat 83 Black Edition (side by side for your setup)
- Extrem Project 83 Eco vs Elan Wildcat 83 C (side by side for your setup)
Get more help
Before you buy
Ordered by what fits this answer. Partner links say so on the row, and a fee never changes the order.
- ReviewsReviews from Aka Skidor, Realskiers, STEEPWe hold no review of this ski yet. Full reviews are with the publications:
- ProductComingWhere to buyNo shops linked yet. We list shops once they send us stock and prices.
- CompareEdge Lab toolCompare with Elan Ripstick 84 WSide by side in the Lab: same skier, same snow.
Where to buy
No shops to show for this ski yet. When we list one, it appears here with the reason it was picked.
Where these numbers come fromextremskis.com, edgelab.ski, read 15 Oct 2026· “est.” marks ours
- Extrem Project 83 Eco - Extrem Ski Co (read 15 Oct 2026)
- Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026)
Numbers come from the maker’s own pages, with the date we read them. “est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours. “from” marks a number the maker does not publish that another source does (a retailer, or an earlier season of the same ski).
