Freeride
Fischer Ranger 102 2026
- Category
- Freeride
- Profile
- not stated
- Lengths
- 169 · 176 · 183 · 190 cm
- Tip / waist / tail
- 136est./ 101est.
Tip width
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours.
/ 126est.Waist width
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours.
mmTail width
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours.
- Radius
- 15.7 mest.at 176 cm
Sidecut radius
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours.
- Weight
- not stated
- Core
- not stated
- Metal
- not stated
- Carbon
- not stated
- Sidewall
- Sandwich
- Base
- not stated
- RRP
- No RRP published
- Intended ability
- not stated
Lengths and published dimensions
169 cm
169 cm
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: tip, waist, tail
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: radius
Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius.
- Tip (mm)
- 136.0est.
- Waist (mm)
- 101.0est.
- Tail (mm)
- 126.0est.
- Radius (m)
- 14.5est.
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
176 cm
176 cm
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: tip, waist, tail
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: radius
Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius.
- Tip (mm)
- 136.0est.
- Waist (mm)
- 101.0est.
- Tail (mm)
- 126.0est.
- Radius (m)
- 15.7est.
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
183 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 136.0
- Waist (mm)
- 101.0
- Tail (mm)
- 126.0
- Radius (m)
- 17.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- 1,760
190 cm
190 cm
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: tip, waist, tail
Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius)
Read: 14 Oct 2026
For: radius
Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius.
- Tip (mm)
- 136.0est.
- Waist (mm)
- 101.0est.
- Tail (mm)
- 126.0est.
- Radius (m)
- 18.3est.
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
| Length | Tip (mm) | Waist (mm) | Tail (mm) | Radius (m) | Weight (g, per ski) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169 cm 169 cm Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: tip, waist, tail Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: radius Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius. | 136.0est. | 101.0est. | 126.0est. | 14.5est. | not published |
| 176 cm 176 cm Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: tip, waist, tail Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: radius Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius. | 136.0est. | 101.0est. | 126.0est. | 15.7est. | not published |
| 183 cm | 136.0 | 101.0 | 126.0 | 17.0 | 1,760 |
| 190 cm 190 cm Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: tip, waist, tail Source: Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius) Read: 14 Oct 2026 For: radius Estimated, ours (the maker does not publish): tip, waist, tail, radius. | 136.0est. | 101.0est. | 126.0est. | 18.3est. | not published |
TAIL 126 mm (est.)WAIST 101 mm (est.)TIP 136 mm (est.)
“est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours. Where each number was read is under “Where these numbers come from” at the bottom.
What the model says
Carve radius, to scale
- Sidecut radius: 15.724327391083637 m (est.)
- Carve radius at 30° edge: 13.6 m
- Carve radius at 45° edge: 11.1 m
Edge hold and float
- Edge hold: 97%, Holds well
- Float: 73%, Floats well
The Fischer Ranger 102 at 176 cm, worked out by the Edge Lab model for three skier weights.
70 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (64%)
- Float, powder
- Floats well (85%)
90 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (97%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (60%)
- Float, powder
- Floats well (73%)
110 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (95%)
- Edge hold, ice
- Slides (57%)
- Float, powder
- Some float (66%)
| Skier | Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60° edge | Edge hold, groomed | Edge hold, ice | Float, powder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 kg | 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (64%) | Floats well (85%) |
| 90 kg | 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m | Holds well (97%) | On the limit (60%) | Floats well (73%) |
| 110 kg | 13.6 / 11.1 / 7.9 m | Holds well (95%) | Slides (57%) | Some float (66%) |
These are the model’s numbers, not measurements. Carve radius comes from the sidecut, so it does not change with weight; edge hold and float do. Flex and camber are our estimates (see “What the model uses” below).
By ability
The Fischer Ranger 102 at 176 cm for a 90 kg skier on groomed snow. Reviewers are mostly experts, so read the left of each band for what most skiers get.
Edge hold
On firm snow, 176 cm- First-timer: slides (18%)
- Beginner: slides (39%)
- Intermediate: on the limit (68%), assumed level
- Advanced: holds well (92%)
- Expert: holds well (97%)
Float
In soft snow- First-timer: some float (56%)
- Beginner: some float (60%)
- Intermediate: some float (63%), assumed level
- Advanced: some float (68%)
- Expert: floats well (73%)
Ease
How forgiving it is- First-timer: hard (23%)
- Beginner: easy (85%)
- Intermediate: easy (100%), assumed level
- Advanced: easy (92%)
- Expert: easy (81%)
Our model, run with working assumptions about how each level skis (edge angle, speed, how much weight reaches the edge). Not measurements. The marked cell assumes an intermediate skier; compare with your own details to see your own level.
Who it suits
It suits
- 70 kg, intermediate, on groomers314 of 802 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 12.6 m at 30° edge and 10.3 m at 45° (169 cm)
- Built from 4 reviews, 0 by testers within 10 kg of you
- Strongest here: edge hold. Even its weakest part, float, is solid.
- 90 kg, advanced, all over the mountain237 of 802 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 13.6 m at 30° edge and 11.1 m at 45° (176 cm)
- 110 kg, expert, off-piste in soft snow213 of 802 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 14.7 m at 30° edge and 12 m at 45° (183 cm)
It doesn’t suit
It lands in the top half of the catalogue for all three skiers we check.
What the model uses
| Flex underfoot | 158 N·m²est. Flex underfoot Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Camber height | 3.3 mmest. Camber height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker | 24.8 % of lengthest. Tip rocker Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker | 13.4 % of lengthest. Tail rocker Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker height | 18.4 mmest. Tip rocker height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker height | 8.6 mmest. Tail rocker height Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Mount point offset | -6.4 cmest. Mount point offset Source: Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) Read: 9 Oct 2026 Estimated: the maker does not publish this number, so it is ours. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
Made of
| Sidewall | Sandwich |
|---|---|
| Maker's description | Sandwich Sidewall Construction, Shaped Ti 0.5, Flex Cut |
Only what the maker prints. A field left out is one the maker does not state.
What reviewers say
Reviews from Realskiers (opens in a new tab)
2023 Fischer Ranger 102
Reviewed as the 2023 model.
The redesigned Ranger 102 retains its surfy, playful persona while incorporating Titanal underfoot for added dampness. It excels in fresh powder, softer snow, and crud, catering to skiers who favor drifting and smearing. While aggressive hard-charging skiers may find the softer tip and tail loose on firm terrain, it remains an accessible, versatile big-mountain tool.
Read the full review (opens in a new tab)2024 Fischer Ranger 102
Reviewed as the 2024 model.
The 2024 Fischer Ranger 102 merges aspects of earlier Ti and FR constructions, offering a surfy, loose feel at the tip and tail alongside enhanced edge grip from a Titanal plate placed underfoot. Featuring an accessible, softer flex, it serves skiers venturing into sidecountry terrain well while retaining dependable underfoot security.
“retaining the loose and smeary extremities of the old 102 FR”
Read the full review (opens in a new tab)From video
2027 Fischer Ranger 102 - SkiEssentials Ski Test Review
SkiEssentials · 17 Aug 2026 · 176 cm tested
Reviewed as the 2027 model.
The Fischer Ranger 102 continues unchanged with a poplar and beech core and targeted shaped titanal. It bridges the gap between all-mountain and freeride, offering a smooth, predictable, and composed ride in mixed terrain. While directional at heart, its tip and tail profile allow playful and freestyle maneuvers. It accommodates advancing intermediates up to expert skiers seeking a versatile, accessible wider ski.
Watch on YouTube from 6:01 (opens in a new tab)From video
2026 Fischer Ranger 102 - SkiEssentials Ski Test Review
SkiEssentials · 8 Aug 2025 · 176 cm tested
The Fischer Ranger 102 returns structurally unchanged for 2026, offering great agility, playful flex, and maneuverability. While not an aggressive carving machine, its beech and poplar wood core with shaped Titanal underfoot provides quiet dampness and stability in chop and softer snow. Featuring deep rocker lines and tapered tips, it pivots and drifts easily in tight spaces and trees, catering well to intermediate through expert skiers seeking a versatile wider all-mountain ride.
Watch on YouTube from 6:20 (opens in a new tab)From video
2025 Fischer Ranger 102 - SkiEssentials.com Ski Test Review
SkiEssentials · 17 Sept 2024 · 176 cm tested
Reviewed as the 2025 model.
Jeff from SkiEssentials tests the 2025 Fischer Ranger 102, noting it returns with fresh cosmetics paying homage to earlier models. It features a beech/poplar wood core, shaped Titanal underfoot, and a supple flex pattern. He finds it highly compliant, damp, smooth, and great for carving on groomers and maneuvering in trees, though its damped feel may feel overly muted to skiers seeking high rebound energy.
Watch on YouTube from 7:07 (opens in a new tab)
Compare with…
- Fischer Ranger 102 vs Elan Playmaker 101 (side by side for your setup)
- Fischer Ranger 102 vs Elan Ripstick 100 W (side by side for your setup)
- Fischer Ranger 102 vs Elan Ripstick 102 (side by side for your setup)
Get more help
Before you buy
Ordered by what fits this answer. Partner links say so on the row, and a fee never changes the order.
- ReviewsReviews from Realskiers, Ski Canada Magazine, SkiEssentialsOur summary of each, with a link to the full review.
- ProductComingWhere to buyNo shops linked yet. We list shops once they send us stock and prices.
- CompareEdge Lab toolCompare with Elan Playmaker 101Side by side in the Lab: same skier, same snow.
Where to buy
No shops to show for this ski yet. When we list one, it appears here with the reason it was picked.
Where these numbers come fromfischersports.com, edgelab.ski, read 14 Oct 2026· “est.” marks ours
- Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published dimensions) (read 14 Oct 2026)
- Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (derived from the 183 cm published radius) (read 14 Oct 2026)
- Ranger 102 | Fischer Sports (read 14 Oct 2026)
- Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026)
Numbers come from the maker’s own pages, with the date we read them. “est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours.