All-mountain · Rocker, camber, rocker
Zag SLAP 92 2026

- Category
- All-mountain
- Profile
- Rocker, camber, rocker
- Lengths
- 160 · 166 · 173 · 178 · 185 cm
- Tip / waist / tail
- 126 / 92 / 112 mm
- Radius
- 18.3 m at 173 cm
- Weight
- not stated
- Core
- paulownia, pour la légèreté, en complément du peuplier, pour la résistance
- Metal
- not stated
- Carbon
- not stated
- Sidewall
- Hybrid
- Base
- not stated
- Intended ability
- not stated
Lengths and published dimensions
160 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 123.0
- Waist (mm)
- 91.0
- Tail (mm)
- 109.0
- Radius (m)
- 16.8
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
166 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 124.0
- Waist (mm)
- 92.0
- Tail (mm)
- 110.0
- Radius (m)
- 17.5
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
173 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 126.0
- Waist (mm)
- 92.0
- Tail (mm)
- 112.2
- Radius (m)
- 18.3
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
178 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 127.0
- Waist (mm)
- 92.0
- Tail (mm)
- 113.2
- Radius (m)
- 19.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
185 cm
- Tip (mm)
- 128.0
- Waist (mm)
- 92.0
- Tail (mm)
- 114.0
- Radius (m)
- 20.0
- Weight (g, per ski)
- not published
| Length | Tip (mm) | Waist (mm) | Tail (mm) | Radius (m) | Weight (g, per ski) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 cm | 123.0 | 91.0 | 109.0 | 16.8 | not published |
| 166 cm | 124.0 | 92.0 | 110.0 | 17.5 | not published |
| 173 cm | 126.0 | 92.0 | 112.2 | 18.3 | not published |
| 178 cm | 127.0 | 92.0 | 113.2 | 19.0 | not published |
| 185 cm | 128.0 | 92.0 | 114.0 | 20.0 | not published |
TAIL 112 mmWAIST 92 mmTIP 126 mm
“est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours. Where each number was read is under “Where these numbers come from” at the bottom.
What the model says
Carve radius, to scale
- Sidecut radius: 18.3 m
- Carve radius at 30° edge: 15.8 m
- Carve radius at 45° edge: 12.9 m
Edge hold and float
- Edge hold: 100%, Holds well
- Float: 51%, Some float
The Zag SLAP 92 at 173 cm, worked out by the Edge Lab model for three skier weights.
70 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (66%)
- Float, powder
- Some float (58%)
90 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (100%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (62%)
- Float, powder
- Some float (51%)
110 kg skier
- Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60°
- 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m
- Edge hold, groomed
- Holds well (98%)
- Edge hold, ice
- On the limit (60%)
- Float, powder
- Some float (46%)
| Skier | Carve radius at 30° / 45° / 60° edge | Edge hold, groomed | Edge hold, ice | Float, powder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 kg | 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (66%) | Some float (58%) |
| 90 kg | 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m | Holds well (100%) | On the limit (62%) | Some float (51%) |
| 110 kg | 15.8 / 12.9 / 9.2 m | Holds well (98%) | On the limit (60%) | Some float (46%) |
These are the model’s numbers, not measurements. Carve radius comes from the sidecut, so it does not change with weight; edge hold and float do. Flex and camber are our estimates (see “What the model uses” below).
By ability
The Zag SLAP 92 at 173 cm for a 90 kg skier on groomed snow. Reviewers are mostly experts, so read the left of each band for what most skiers get.
Edge hold
On firm snow, 173 cm- First-timer: slides (19%)
- Beginner: slides (41%)
- Intermediate: on the limit (70%), assumed level
- Advanced: holds well (95%)
- Expert: holds well (100%)
Float
In soft snow- First-timer: sinks (39%)
- Beginner: sinks (42%)
- Intermediate: sinks (44%), assumed level
- Advanced: some float (47%)
- Expert: some float (51%)
Ease
How forgiving it is- First-timer: hard (0%)
- Beginner: manageable (57%)
- Intermediate: easy (100%), assumed level
- Advanced: easy (100%)
- Expert: easy (93%)
Our model, run with working assumptions about how each level skis (edge angle, speed, how much weight reaches the edge). Not measurements. The marked cell assumes an intermediate skier; compare with your own details to see your own level.
Who it suits
It suits
- 90 kg, advanced, all over the mountain307 of 739 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 15.8 m at 30° edge and 12.9 m at 45° (173 cm)
- Strongest here: edge hold. Weakest: float.
- 110 kg, expert, off-piste in soft snow334 of 739 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
It doesn’t suit
- 70 kg, intermediate, on groomers459 of 739 skis in the catalogue for this skier.
- Carve radius about 15.8 m at 30° edge and 12.9 m at 45° (173 cm)
- Strongest here: edge hold. Weakest: float.
What the model uses
| Flex underfoot | 182 N·m²est. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Camber height | 4.2 mmest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker | 21.2 % of lengthest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker | 8.6 % of lengthest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tip rocker height | 13.6 mmest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Tail rocker height | 4.4 mmest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
| Mount point offset | -7.6 cmest. | Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026) |
Made of
| Core | paulownia, pour la légèreté, en complément du peuplier, pour la résistance |
|---|---|
| Sidewall | Hybrid |
Only what the maker prints. A field left out is one the maker does not state.
What reviewers say
No published reviews of this ski yet.
Compare with…
- Zag SLAP 92 vs Armada ANTIMATTER 92 (side by side for your setup)
- Zag SLAP 92 vs Armada AntiMatter 92 W (side by side for your setup)
- Zag SLAP 92 vs Armada DECLIVITY 92 TI (side by side for your setup)
Where to buy
No shops to show for this ski yet. When we list one, it appears here with the reason it was picked.
Where these numbers come fromzagskis.com, edgelab.ski, read 11 Oct 2026· “est.” marks ours
- SLAP 92 | Ski All-Mountain & Freeride ludique | ZAG Skis (read 11 Oct 2026)
- Edge Lab archetype default (interpolated by waist) (read 9 Oct 2026)
Numbers come from the maker’s own pages, with the date we read them. “est.” marks a number the maker does not publish: ours.